Abri-form Original X-plus Ohio

INTERVENTION (2) INTERVENTION

XV Legislature March 2, 2010

ROMANO. I ask to speak.

PRESIDENT. It has the power.

ROMANO. I wanted to speak on this sub-amendment to clarify two points. There are formal aspects of
that the first, second and third
item can be accepted by the Government, namely the addition of "residential", the deletion of the last sentence of paragraph 1,
which explains the appearance of architectural and urban "work order" and the correction of the word
"on "with" the ".
As, however, I am concerned, I think we should be against the abolition of
paragraph 4.
We must understand, Mr. President, the Government, all here, with the understanding that without both of
table groups or not. If we put in the works that have benefited from the amnesty with
roomy, with a valid license or not, we must understand why this issue will resurface
to each article.
We have to understand and, if necessary, stop the work. I do not think that this sub-amendment should be voted
entire collection. It 's a risk, we give a distorted picture of the outside;
we are trying to make a clean law, a law that is consistent with the Agreement State-Region
the deletion of this section to open the shirt perverse to equate who did the abuse
who behaved correctly.
I think about what this Parliament should have a burst of pride, we're not curing, not healing
we have nothing.
I know how he is the governor Lombardo about it. It should not be a law of amnesty,
we said, Dear Councillor, we must understand. I do not have to make a law on amnesty
, but for a law that sets in motion the building and allow the families of Sicilian
able to do that something extra that they have done illegally.
Thus there is an ethical issue, there is a formal problem.
I think this part might be, too, is incorrect because the contested reward those who did
abuse, among other things, doing a load volume with the ability to take advantage of 20% for the part
abuse, including be borne by the party to have the abusive surplus load.
I think that is really immoral to cross off the paragraph 4 of this article!
immoral!